So it has come to this.
If anyone dares to shine the light of truth onto the illegal wars and the disgraceful behaviour of the hopefully few rogue soldiers who indulge in disgusting acts against the enemy, they are thrown into the lions den.
The mafia American, Israeli and British governments- because that is all they are- will silence anyone who exposes their cult of evil and their anti human atrocities they inflict on innocent men, women and children on a daily basis.
Julian Assange showed the World what was really happening in these sick, sick wars. He exposed the truth.
America went into overdrive.
So desperate is America to get Assange, that they tell the British government to storm the embassy of Ecuador in London and capture Assange, if Ecuador grants him asylum.
The British Government wrote to the the Ecuador government and threatened them that they had every right to do this.
Assange has now been granted asylum and the foreign office says that it is not backing down on its mafia threats.
What's the date?
Are we back in the 1800s when Britain acted like the king of the World?
Er- no.
How arrogant is this?
What is this- Nazi Britain?Here are parts of a definition of the word 'Nazi' from the dictionary com site:suppressing all opposition and establishing a dictatorship over all cultural, economic and political activities of the people.Note the words'suppressing all opposition'.Come to think of it ,the rest of the definition, applies to not only Britain, but the U.S.A.too.
Well, the much loved( according to the B.B.C. and the Daily Mail) Prince Phillip has strong Nazi connections as does the Bush family.
Let's get this straight.
Under the terms of the 1961 United Nations Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations, embassies remain under the jurisdiction of the nation they represent, meaning that the British police have no authority to storm the Ecuador's embassy.
The convention is the cornerstone of International relations, and has been signed by 200 countries.
In 1987, in Britain, a law was inacted under which the diplomatic status of an embassy can be revoked
This was introduced following the 11 day Libyan Embassy seige when a gunman had shot and killed the highly unfortunate W.P.C. Yvonne Fletcher.The gunman was allowed to escape under the cover of diplomatic immunity.
It is this law that the Foreign Office is using as a gun at the head of the Ecuador government. Typical mafia tactics.
However, Carl Gardner, a former government lawyer, says that this particular law was specifically designed to stop acts of terrorism and other breaches of International law within a foreign embassy which Ecuador was not guilty of.
Because of this, the British government could well be in breach of the Vienna Convention which protects the status over embassies and diplomats, if the government used the law to send the police into Ecaudor's Embassy.
Sir Tony Brenton, who was the U.K's ambassador to Russia between 2004 and 2008 told B.B.C's radio four programme, that if the government does do this, it would become impossible for those working in British embassies abroad, and that he thinks it 'highly unlikely' that they would do this.
Put another way, he means that if Britain does this, any other country in the World could follow suit.I really do not think that the British Government would like the idea of this. Then again, maybe they are so in awe of Israel and America they might just do it.
But the very fact that they had the nerve to suggest that they would do such an outrageous, never -before - done- act shows their true colours.
America, Britain and Israel really do believe that they have the right to control the World.They break laws they themselves make; they kill people like Dr. Kelly and Robin Cook and countless lesser lights who stand in their way.
They are pure evil.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment